Lab Statistics – How Much Wood?

Wood for testing
Wood for testing

Like many people with desk jobs, I just have to get up and walk around every once in a while. Most of my walks are through our connector test lab at our home office in Pleasanton, California. The lab technicians install a lot of products for testing, so in addition to stretching my legs, I like to quiz them for ideas on things we can do to make installation faster and easier for our products.

Discarded wood from testing
Discarded wood from testing

During one of my walks this week, a lab technician was finishing up a rather extensive test setup that consumed a large quantity of lumber, screws, and truss plates. I asked him how it was going and he commented, “Testing isn’t exactly environmentally friendly, is it?”

Before I could even respond, he added, “I guess that’s just part of the price of building safer buildings.” I like the way he thinks.

I know we produce a lot of wood waste every day in our connector test lab, but having this conversation made me curious to put some numbers to it. So I did a little research to roughly estimate how much lumber and what sizes we used in test setups for a year. 4×12 headers seem to be the size that works for so many joist hanger tests, so my hunch was that size would be the winner.

HU46SS Setups
HU46SS Setups

Lumber Usage:

lumber usage

HHRC Test Setup
HHRC Test Setup

But my hunch was wrong! Close, but going by lineal feet, the humble 2×4 leads the pack. Board feet is more meaningful, since it captures the volume, so by that measure the 4×4 is the winner. While it is true that we use more 4×12 than any other size material for joist hanger tests, we use many 4×4’s as the main member in the testing of proprietary screws and nails, such as the Strong-Drive® SDS, SDW, SDWS and SDWH.

SDWH Test
SDWH Test

Adding everything up, we are consuming about 15,700 board-feet of lumber in our test setups. A small cost when weighed against the value of safe, strong structures!

– Paul

Author: Paul McEntee

A couple of years back we hosted a “Take your daughter or son to work day,” which was a great opportunity for our children to find out what their parents did. We had different activities for the kids to learn about careers and the importance of education in opening up career opportunities. People often ask me what I do for Simpson Strong-Tie and I sometimes laugh about how my son Ryan responded to a questionnaire he filled out that day: Q.   What is your mom/dad's job? A.   Goes and gets coffee and sits at his desk Q.   What does your mom/dad actually do at work? A.   Walks in the test lab and checks things When I am not checking things in the lab or sitting at my desk drinking coffee, I manage Engineering Research and Development for Simpson Strong-Tie, focusing on new product development for connectors and lateral systems. I graduated from the University of California at Berkeley and I am a licensed Civil and Structural Engineer in California. Prior to joining Simpson Strong-Tie, I worked for 10 years as a consulting structural engineer designing commercial, industrial, multi-family, mixed-use and retail projects. I was fortunate in those years to work at a great engineering firm that did a lot of everything. This allowed me to gain experience designing with wood, structural steel, concrete, concrete block and cold-formed steel as well as working on many seismic retrofits of historic unreinforced masonry buildings.

3 thoughts on “Lab Statistics – How Much Wood?”

    1. Most connectors require testing. IBC Section 1716.1 Test standards for joist hangers and connectors details out the requirements to run a minimum of three tests, a safety factor of 3, and the 1/8″ deflection limit, plus calculations. Straight straps are an exception that are calculated only.

      There is not much difference in what we would submit for a product approval. For a calculated only product, we would submit calculations, production drawings, and quality control documentation. For a tested product, we would submit all of that plus test reports.

Comments are closed.